Subcrime phase 3: Sovereign chaos in Ireland & S.Europe

Chronicles of subcrime-3

(being 1 the ORIGINAL, namely in Ireland, Spain, UK and US; 2 the Centre-East EU transition countries 2009-10 collapse. In Phase 3 the € and EU are on the verge of chaos, because of the unsustainable costs-debts of Financial Socialism, plus country-specific stories adding up in a Deutsche uber alles divide)

ITALIAN ABSTRACT FIRSTTOO BIG 2B BAILED OUT: il gioco del cerino tra Zapatero ed una poltrona vuota

2 dic.: il Messaggero apre col governo salva-Bot: Babbo Natale sarà Mario Draghi? E per Tremonti finisce senza gloria: lui sarà la Befana. Ma 3monti non la conta giusta – dietro le quinte..

Spain’s problem, Italian job

– Posted by Joseph Cotterill on Dec 02 11:00 (Alphaville)

L’Italia ha 2 problemi strutturali:
a) il debito pubblico creato PERSONALMENTE da Craxi, De Michelis (perche’ non lo ripaga ‘sto stronzo?) e Forlani nei 1980s;
b) la non-crescita della produttività delle risorse (e quindi del PIL) dagli stessi anni, fine-fine del Miracolo.
Il combinato disposto e’  già insostenibile agli attuali spread. Ancor più a tassi d’interesse più elevati

IL DEFAULT DEI BOTS ENTRO PRIMAVERA 2011: nei prossimi mesi gli attacchi ad ariete della “speculazione” saranno contro i 2 colossi d’argilla, Spagna ed Italia, che ne’ la Germania vuole, ne’ l’IMF può salvare in ultima istanza: TOO BIG 2 B BAILED OUT (sono già cominciati a fine novembre, con l’allungarsi ulteriore degli spread). Ma l’Italia si troverà senza governo… Qualsiasi reazione strategica di Zapatero (credo non tanto “rigore” -sic- fiscale, ma flessibilità e mercati liberi), aggraverà gli spread dei bot i-tagliani.

Chi ha avuto la pazza, idiota e fetente idea di buttare tutti, inclusi i poveri Cristi barocco-decadenti (DA SECOLI) del Portogallo, in uno stesso EURO-calderone? E, per di più, il tutto SENZA DEI CONTINUI E SISTEMATICI, RIGOROSI E PRECISI meccanismi di compensazione finanziaria, fiscale e nelle strutture industriali. Per non parlare di convergenze nelle società civili ed istituzioni, che impiegano secoli.

Oppure, assai + semplicemente: nessun €.Non era un romano, o Romano?

Phastidio.net

La corda al collo

30 NOV.

Secondo un analista di JPMorgan, una decurtazione di “solo” il 20 per cento del valore di rimborso di titoli di stato greci, irlandesi, spagnoli e portoghesi determinerebbe l’azzeramento del capitale proprio delle banche francesi. E’ sempre più drammaticamente chiaro che fare ciò che andrebbe fatto (colpire gli obbligazionisti senior) determinerebbe il crollo del sistema bancario europeo.

Altro dato che, più che parlare, urla: il tasso d’interesse medio che l’Irlandapagherà sul prestito congiunto di Ue e FMI è del 5,8 per cento complessivo. Dal 2014 il servizio di questo debito sarà pari a circa il 25 per cento delle entrate del paese. Secondo i dati storici di Moody’s, la percentuale di servizio del debito sul totale delle entrate che provoca il default è del 22 per cento. Il piano di “aiuti” per l’Irlanda è semplicemente infattibile.

La strada dell’inferno è lastricata di salvataggi

MONDAY, 29 NOVEMBER, 2010

in ECONOMIA & MERCATO,ITALIA,UNIONE EUROPEA

Da dove cominciamo, volendo peraltro essere sintetici? Da una circostanza che ci ha colpito nei giorni scorsi: un numero ampio e crescente di cittadini irlandesi si dicono favorevoli al default dello stato nei confronti degli obbligazionisti bancari, in luogo di un devastante programma di austerità che lascerà il paese in condizioni di prostrazione per molti anni a venire. Eppure, le idee di Unione europea e FMI sono molto chiare: nessuna ristrutturazione per le obbligazioni bancarie senior.

[click to continue…]


ENGLISH SPEAKING SECTION OF THE POST on the Italian default.

The worst is just coming: be patient, please!

Dec. 3

wsj

Spain Faces Hurdles on Reforms

With markets increasing pressure on Spain, Prime Minister José Luis Rodriguez Zapatero is running out of the political capital necessary to force through difficult reforms that could ease investor concerns.

Nov.30

ftalphaville.ft.com

Are Belgium and Italy safe?

http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2010/11/30/420606/insolvent-greece-ireland-portugal-and-probably-spain/

Neil Hume (with his emphases) quotes the Citigroup chief economist, Willem ‘Maverecon’ Buiter

Portugal and Greece:

After an Irish agreement with the EU/IMF, the market’s attention is likely to turn to Portugal’s sovereign, which at current levels of interest rates and growth rates, is less dramatically, but quietly, insolvent, in our view. We consider it likely that it will need to access the EFSF soon.

Greece is de facto insolvent, in our view, all the more so after the recent debt and deficit revisions. As long as Greece remains sufficiently compliant with the conditionality of its EU/IMF program, sovereign debt restructuring is likely to be postponed at least until mid-2013, when its EU/IMF programme expires. At that point, it likely will be transferred to the EFSF or its successor. Whether its debt will be restructured at that stage, including haircuts, will depend on factors beyond the sustainability of its debt.

Spain:

For now, the markets have put Spain in Italy’s sovereign risk class when, in our view, it should be closer to Portugal and Ireland once its banking sector problems are recognised. We argued before that the EFSF should be much larger (€2trn). Should Spain need assistance, it will stretch the resources of the EFSF, perhaps beyond its current limits. There may be some room to expand the size of the EFSF. But, in our view, once Spain needs assistance, the support of the ECB will be critical (by purchasing Spanish sovereign debt through its Securities Markets Program — SMP — and funding Spanish banks using Spanish sovereign debt or sovereign-guaranteed financial instruments as collateral or by making loans to or purchasing the debt of the EFSF, legally a limited liability company that could even be made an eligible counterparty of the Eurosystem for this purpose).

In the longer term, there may be a need for large-scale restructuring of the debt of the Spanish banking sector and possibly the sovereign. At longer horizons, high debt levels and political instability in Italy and Belgium may yet give rise to fundamentally warranted sovereign debt crises, while self-justifying crises are possible even in the near term, despite roughly balanced structural primary budgets.

And if you thought that the EU/IMF bailout marked the end of Ireland’s troubles, think again says Buiter:

Accessing external sources of funds will not mark the end of Ireland’s troubles. The reason is that, in our view, the consolidated Irish sovereign and Irish domestic financial system is de facto insolvent. The Irish sovereign cannot from its own resources ‘bail out’ the banks and make its own creditors whole. In addition, a fully-fledged bailout (permanent fiscal transfer) from EA partners or the ECB is most unlikely. Therefore, either the unsecured non-guaranteed creditors of the banks, and/or the creditors of the sovereign may eventually have to accept a restructuring with an NPV haircut, even if it is not a condition for accessing the EFSF or the EFSM at present.

Nov. 27 wsj:

Traders’ Targets: Portugal and Spain

Investors are concerned that European countries’ funding problems could spread to much-bigger economies, such as Spain, Italy or even France, where a bailout could be impractical.

Nov. 26 wsj:

Slow Growth Stymies Portugal

Unlike Greece or Ireland, Portugal is finding itself in the crosshairs of investors largely because of a chronic weakness: Over the past decade, it couldn’t adapt to globalization and failed to grow.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703678404575636703032223846.html?mod=WSJ_World_LEFTSecondNews

Read the last paper for a photography of the Portuguese UNDESERVED mess. My comment.

WANTED: The criminal and idiot that invented

1) the €

2) and its imlementation without any integration process, and structural correction process;

in such a way as to throw the poor baroque, and decadent Portuguese  people in such a mess – just because of the “social experiments” (à la Mao Zedong) and mistakes committed elsewhere; in Berlin and London, Washington DC and  Wall Street. And in Bruxelles by whom? I can’t remember: was he a roman guy perhaps?  Roman? Romanesque, in the sense attributed by  Leopardi…

Aulas de “Economia industrial da crise” no IE\Unicamp

Aqui està algum material, que serà de tempo em tempo atualisado, sobre algumas meas aulas como Profesor Visitante  no IE (Instituto de Economia, dir. Marian Laplane) da Unicamp, Campinas SP.

En seguida, tudo este material ficarà fora da blog-timeline, na proxima pagina “fixa” intitulada UNICAMP, que continuarà sua vida propria como a pagina deste blog em lingua portuguesa (com erros, infelizmente – nenhum e’ perfeito). Ver “STATIC PAGES” aqui na coluna de direita, onde em dezembro vai aparecer o iten UNICAMP.

Materiais de leitura com bibliografias:

1) os seminarios e as aulas sao partes dum eschema mas amplo (nao inteiramente tratado, por falta de tempo) “A ECONOMIA INDUSTRIAL DA CRISE” – ilustrado nesse documento: EcoIndaCrise1011_current_v

2) as 3 aulas das terças ferias 10 – 17 – 24 novembro, pelo Seminario da Pos-Graduaçao (Mestrado, Doutorados) sao resumidas nesses documentos.

1o novembro: 1011010aula_I_Enzo. “Background” para entender melhor a atual crise da Irlanda, que està dinamizando a CRISE SOBERANA EUROPEIA:

http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2010/nov/11/ireland-rise-crash/

Para quem sabe ler Italiano, ver tamben no assunto Irlandes esta discussao:

http://www.noisefromamerika.org/index.php/articles/Di_chi_%C3%A8_vittima_l’Irlanda%3F

17 novembro: 101117aula_II > “Commanding Heights”, a cit. entervista da Laura Tyson sobre a Politica Economica da epoca Clintoniana: int_lauratyson_CLINTONadm

24 novembro: a tecnologia e as prospectivas de longo prazo; novas bolhas, e uma nova onda lunga?

101124aula3seminario_v1

Interessante este twitter msg (em Italiano) que reuna 2 temas da nossa resenha dos novos paradigmas, o trans-humanismo e o quantum computing:

 

 

transumanisti network h+

Computer quantistici più vicini alla realtà grazie a nuove ricerche teoriche: I computer quantistici potrebbero … http://bit.ly/dGQ0TL
Falamos mesmo de spin:
cienciahoje Ciência Hoje
Adilson de Oliveira explica o que é o spin e mostra como ele revolucionará o processamento da informação: http://is.gd/hqoIy

Terà aviso nessa pagina – em breve (Dezembro) transferida na pagina statica UNICAMP – quando eu atualizo alguns documentos, com novos argomentos ou  bibliografias.

Para interagir, podem mandar comentos aquì por qualquer esclarecimento, pedido, pergunta o outro assunto. CIAO (tchao).

G20: invented late 2008, dead 2 y. later?

Chronicles of a currency war

G20 was the hurried up way to fully incorporate BRICs into financial regulation and fiscal policy coordination and global decision making (as for monetary policies, they are are alreadly informally coordinated, inasmuch as possible and sound, by the CBs “club”). We discussed at length its first moves in this blog (see December 2008 posts).

At the first real crisis, 2 years after it doesn’t work AT ALL. To make things simple, Obama has no more a proper leadership (max, just agenda-setting powers), and Chindia is not yet nor soon the new Empire (and such an empire will substantially depend upon the path eventually leading to it).

The sharp division created on the one hand by “helicopter” Bernanke’s $0.6 trillions QE2, and on the other by yuan’s under-valuation by an est. 19% (source:  Peterson Inst. of Int.l Econ.), would have been quite easy and straightforward to deal with and solve, had a proper bargaining environment been there. It wasn’t.

The near future will tell us if it is just the G20 who’s dead, or the willingness to bargain, or both.

Inspired by the noisefromamerika blog style, and specifically by a quite similar table (same structure) at page B14 in  Folha de S.Paulo today, here is its last outcome.

EXPLAINING THE G20 FINAL DOC

IT SAYS\IT MEANS

1. exchange

To evolve towards exchange systems more market determined: by stressing the exchanges’ flex in order to reflect the underlying fundamentals, and avoiding competitive devaluations.

This point is FULLY anti-Chinese, because this is the country whose exchange control is more striking, and particularly US-annoying (the US leaders being so stupid, that they do not want to change their economic base, even after such a momentum crisis; if they had a proper Industrial Plan, they wouldn’t care much about the yuan). Message: China must undervalue, but under-valuation in general must not be used as a weapon, a pro-X (eXport) policy (a basic lesson from the 1930s katastrophe’).

2. Flow of capitals

The advanced economies, incl. those issuing reserve-currencies, will vigilate against disordered changes in the exchange rates. Their actions will help to prevent an excess volatility in the ST capital influx towards some emerging countries.

This is the compensating anti-US point. The yankees must stop to print money in order to buy credit. In Brazil as in China and elsewhere, Helicopter Bernanke’s $ create speculative K inflows, hence potentially Greenspan-style bubbles in commodities or housing. No, thanks. $ go home!

3. Disequilibria

The IMF might play a role here, by developing further the MAP (Mutual Assessment Process). The final target is ambitious: to match external stability together with fiscal, monetary, financial and exchange consistency.

Obama’s +\- 4% GNP  threshold (for S-I = X-M surpluses) has been thrown to the garbage. Now the IMF “arbiter” must deal with the hot potato, and is called to some persuasion hard job. But the Empire-like (centre-periphery)  divergence between over-saving BRICs and under-saving North Atlantic old powers is always there, and no one knows how to deal with it. Empires’ history tells how to do (read Marcello de Cecco, e.g.).

4. Safety nets

Make stronger the global financial safety nets, in such a way as to help the countries to cope with financial volatility.

If one country is financially sound (not Greece), but is hit by a financial exogenous choc, it will have title to receive credit and emergency help.

5. IMF reform

The leaders approve their Ministers’ decision to widen the participation of dynamic emerging countries to IMF shares.

BRICs and NICs will put more money in the IMF, hence get more power. The IMF’s architecture will (in part) close the gap with the economic geography of the real world.

6. Financial system reforms

The financial system regulation must become stronger, with tighter capital and liquidity requirements.

Here was the G20 good start, with the Commission coordinated by Draghi, which has been working meanwhile. Vikram Pandit, the Citi’s CEO sent a mafioso message to the G2o on the Financial Times: to impose higher capital and liquidity standards might have a significant negative impact upon banking systems, consumers and economies. Here the G20 returns compact once, in order to face the Financial Criminals that did  not respond anywhere of their sub-crimes. But the banks have already won the game. The proof is that Mr Pandit, after blackmailing all the past and future superpowers and their intelligences, is still alive.

7. Fiscal policies

Advanced countries must adopt such fiscal re-adjustment plans as to be “clear”, and “pro-growth”. Paying atn that they risk to deteriorate the economic recovery.

Leaders come over one year of impasse (US versus EU, lead by “Empire of austerity” Germany) between applied “keynesism” (keep State budget deficits high) and avoiding Sovereign debt collapses (reduce State deficits). The inner ambiguity of the issue is recognized.

8. Doha Round

A strong commitment to a success of the commercial liberalisation.

They keep saying it, but they don’t really mean it.

The reality of the 2007-2011+ crisis is of course against free trade (at least temporarily). Doha Round never took off since from its start in 2001. Now it’s unofficially dead.

At the opening of the G20, two closest allies such as the US and SK could not announce a bilateral free trade agreement. That was the sign that the atmosphere was really, really bad.